RESUMO
Abstract Objective To evaluate the satisfaction of family caregivers with a mental health inpatient service in Brazil. Methods This was a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach. A sample of 80 caretaking family members answered the abbreviated version of the Brazilian Mental Health Services' Family Satisfaction scale (SATIS-BR) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages and quantitative variables as means and standard deviations. Interactions among variables and indexes of the scale were analyzed using the Student's t test, Pearson correlation coefficient and analysis of variance. Results The results showed a high mean overall satisfaction score when considering the categorization of the items of the scale, with higher satisfaction indexes in the 'Treatment results' subscale and lower ones in the 'Reception and competence of staff' and 'Privacy and confidentiality' subscales. In the comparison of the samples studied, greater scores were observed in general satisfaction and in factors in the medical residency care model than in the attending psychiatrist model. There were no significant differences in terms of family member satisfaction in relation to sociodemographic variables. Conclusion Family member satisfaction was high. The need for improvement in aspects related to the infrastructure of services was evident. This paper underlines the importance of continuous and regular evaluations of the services provided, focusing on the satisfaction of users and family members in order to better understand the factors that contribute towards the quality of care provided.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a satisfação de familiares cuidadores com um serviço de internação em saúde mental no Brasil. Métodos Trata-se de um estudo transversal, com abordagem quantitativa. Uma amostra de 80 familiares cuidadores respondeu à Escala de Avaliação da Satisfação de Familiares com os Serviços de Saúde Mental (SATIS-BR), além de questionário sociodemográfico. As variáveis categóricas foram expressas como freqüências e porcentagens, e as variáveis quantitativas, como médias e desvios padrão. As interações entre variáveis e índices da escala foram analisadas utilizando o test t de Student, correlação de Pearson e análise de variância. Resultados Os resultados indicaram escore médio de satisfação geral elevado quando considerada a categorização dos itens da escala, tendo ocorrido maiores índices de satisfação no fator 'Resultados do tratamento' e menores índices nos fatores 'Acolhida e competência da equipe' e 'Privacidade e confidencialidade'. Na comparação das amostras estudadas, foram observados maiores escores de satisfação geral e por fator no modelo de atendimento residência médica em relação ao modelo psiquiatra assistente. Não houve diferenças significativas quanto à satisfação dos familiares em relação às variáveis sociodemográficas. Conclusão A satisfação dos familiares foi elevada. Foram evidenciadas necessidades de melhoria nos aspectos relacionados à infraestrutura dos serviços. Esta pesquisa aponta para a importância de serem realizadas avaliações contínuas e regulares dos serviços, tendo como foco a satisfação dos usuários e familiares para uma melhor compreensão dos fatores que contribuem para a qualidade do atendimento.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Família/psicologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Hospitalização , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Estudos Transversais , Satisfação do Paciente , Hospitais Psiquiátricos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the satisfaction of family caregivers with a mental health inpatient service in Brazil. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach. A sample of 80 caretaking family members answered the abbreviated version of the Brazilian Mental Health Services' Family Satisfaction scale (SATIS-BR) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages and quantitative variables as means and standard deviations. Interactions among variables and indexes of the scale were analyzed using the Student's t test, Pearson correlation coefficient and analysis of variance. RESULTS: The results showed a high mean overall satisfaction score when considering the categorization of the items of the scale, with higher satisfaction indexes in the 'Treatment results' subscale and lower ones in the 'Reception and competence of staff' and 'Privacy and confidentiality' subscales. In the comparison of the samples studied, greater scores were observed in general satisfaction and in factors in the medical residency care model than in the attending psychiatrist model. There were no significant differences in terms of family member satisfaction in relation to sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSION: Family member satisfaction was high. The need for improvement in aspects related to the infrastructure of services was evident. This paper underlines the importance of continuous and regular evaluations of the services provided, focusing on the satisfaction of users and family members in order to better understand the factors that contribute towards the quality of care provided.
